Seafood has long been marketed as the ultimate superfood, prized for its omega-3 fatty acids and lean protein. However, a convergence of new scientific data and industry reports reveals a troubling paradox: the trade networks designed to feed the world are actively redistributing toxic risks, serving up per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—so-called "forever chemicals"—alongside the catch of the day.
As governments scramble to update regulations, the seafood industry faces a reckoning with these synthetic chemicals, which have been used for decades in non-stick cookware, firefighting foam, and food packaging. Because they do not break down in the environment, PFAS accumulate in marine life and, subsequently, in the humans who consume them.
The Conveyor Belt of Contamination
A landmark analysis published in Science has mapped the global exposure risk of PFAS through fish consumption, uncovering a stark reality: international trade redistributes exposure risks from highly contaminated regions to areas with lower local pollution.
Researchers compiled data from over 3,126 sites and analyzed PFAS levels in more than 200 marine species. The findings indicate that while fish from Africa and North America showed the lowest concentrations, stocks in Asia and Oceania—including Australia’s eastern coast—exhibited the highest rates of contamination.
Crucially, the study identifies Europe as a primary "hub" for this toxic transport. While fish caught in European waters may not have the highest contamination levels globally, the continent's role in importing and re-exporting seafood facilitates the spread of these chemicals worldwide.
This redistribution poses a significant challenge for public health. Pablo Gago, a senior scientist at the Institute of Environmental Diagnosis and Water Studies, notes that while bans on specific compounds like PFOS have lowered some risks, unregulated "forever chemicals" continue to permeate the food web through trade.
The Health Paradox: When Healthy Eating Turns Toxic
The human cost of this contamination is becoming increasingly visible. A study led by Dartmouth College focused on New Hampshire, a coastal U.S. state with high seafood consumption, found that residents who frequently ate seafood faced an increased risk of PFAS exposure.
The study highlighted a critical regulatory gap: while federal guidelines exist for mercury in fish, there are none for PFAS. "Our recommendation isn't to not eat seafood... But it also is a potentially underestimated source of PFAS exposure in humans," says Dr. Megan Romano, the study’s corresponding author. Researchers found that shrimp and lobster contained some of the highest concentrations, likely due to their bottom-feeding habits and proximity to coastal pollution sources.
Regulatory Lag: A Timeline of Delays
Despite mounting evidence, regulatory action remains fragmented. In the European Union, a report from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) reveals that member states are pushing to delay necessary pollution controls until 2039—potentially wasting over a decade in the fight against toxic pollution.
The EEB report notes that current EU rules are "masking the true extent of the crisis," as member states are often only required to monitor one type of PFAS (PFOS), ignoring thousands of other harmful variants. This delay occurs even as monitoring data from Austria, France, and Sweden shows that fish samples frequently exceed proposed safety limits, in some cases by thousands of times.
Globally, the regulatory landscape is a patchwork. China has established standards for PFOS and PFOA in animal-derived foods and is moving to expand this to 30 PFAS compounds. In the United States, individual states like Maine are setting their own limits in the absence of comprehensive federal bans, while the FDA has only recently begun targeting seafood in its compliance testing.
"Prop 65 on Steroids": Industry Under Pressure
For the seafood industry, PFAS represents a looming crisis described by Sea Watch International’s Guy Simmons as "Prop 65 on steroids," referring to California’s strict chemical warning laws. The issue moved from theoretical to financial in 2022 when Bumble Bee Foods was forced to recall smoked clams after FDA testing found detectable PFAS levels.
The contamination vector is not solely environmental; it also comes from packaging. Recent studies suggest that polymeric PFAS used in food wrappers and containers, previously thought to be safe, can break down and leach harmful molecules into food. This has led major retailers and fast-food chains to commit to phasing out PFAS in packaging by 2025.
The Traceability Imperative
Facing reputational ruin and regulatory crackdowns, the industry is increasingly viewing digital traceability as a lifeline. A review of digital technologies notes that tools like blockchain, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), and the Internet of Things (IoT) are essential for validating the "bait to plate" journey of seafood.
Currently, global seafood supply chains are notoriously opaque, facilitating not only chemical contamination but also illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Effective traceability systems can capture "Key Data Elements" (KDEs) such as catch location, vessel ID, and processing details, making it harder to hide products sourced from highly contaminated waters.
However, adoption is uneven. An engagement report by the FAIRR Initiative found that while major companies like Thai Union and CP Foods have made commitments to full-chain traceability, the industry at large lags in implementation. "The overwhelming majority of global seafood supply today is still not adequately traceable," the report warns.
Australia’s Strategic Dilemma
In Australia, the pressure to adapt is mounting. A consultation paper by SafeFish highlights the vulnerabilities in Australia's current export monitoring system, noting "thin coverage" for some species and a lack of routine testing for emerging hazards like PFAS.
To maintain market access, Australia is weighing options ranging from maintaining the status quo to implementing a "minimum national baseline" of testing embedded in exporter arrangements. The goal is to ensure that Australian seafood—marketed as clean and premium—can withstand the scrutiny of increasingly cautious global importers.
Conclusion
The contamination of the world’s seafood supply with PFAS is a bellwether for the broader health of our oceans. While the international fish trade effectively democratizes access to protein, it currently also redistributes exposure to industrial toxins.
As the Science study authors conclude, the solution lies in a dual approach: stricter international regulations to phase out these chemicals at the source, and robust, technology-driven traceability to ensure that what ends up on the dinner plate is safe. Until then, "forever chemicals" remain an invisible catch in nets around the world.
Blue Subsurface is brought to you by Oceanfront Agency.
Oceanfront is the only communication and marketing agency specializing in global environmental and geotechnical issues. Book a discovery call today.